Re: Suggestion: Adding a "real class" property

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Arnaud Charlet (charlet@ACT-Europe.FR)
Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 09:57:22 EDT

> Do you mean that the user would insert a GtkCTree into the interface, and set
> the 'Real Class' to 'MyCtree'?

Right.

> The source code output may be a problem. We could possibly use
>
> widget = gtk_type_new (gtk_type_from_name ("MyCTree"))
>
> but the type would have to be initialized before this was called.
> Any arguments passed to construct the widget would be awkward as well.

The arguments would be the same as for the parent class.
Note that in Ada all we would need is the name of the type and the name of
the package (file) that contains the type.

So maybe this would also make more sense for Ada only ?
What about an Ada only property that would define the real type and the
name of the package where the type is defined ?

Do you need a patch ?

Arno

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to majordomo@ncis.pn.org
with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 01 2000 - 19:28:38 EDT