Re: [xml] Re: [gdome] gdome2

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [xml] Re: [gdome] gdome2
From: Havoc Pennington (hp@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 20:10:34 EST

Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org> writes:
> Suppose that with gnome 2.0 all apps have to change
>
> #include <gnome/xxx.h>
> to
> #include <gnome2/xxx.h>
>
> then I'm pretty sure I would not be the only one to complain :-)
>

In gnome2 the headers will be in prefix/include/gnome2/libgnomeui/ and
prefix/include/gnome2/libgnome/, and gnome-config --cflags will output
-I prefix/include/gnome2, so apps don't have to change, then for
gnome3 the same things happens, etc., it is all
application-transparent just as for glibconfig.h and other headers we
have in weird places.

Also, the .so file itself is renamed, I think, but I'm not sure
exactly how that is set up. Elliot can give you more info.

Havoc 

----
message from gdome@rufus.w3.org
Archive at http://rufus.w3.org/tools/gdome/messages/
Unsubscribing: echo "unsubscribe gdome" | mail majordomo@rufus.w3.org

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Apr 05 2000 - 09:54:00 EDT