Subject: [gdome] gdome2
From: Mathieu Lacage (lacage@email.enst.fr)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 08:24:31 EST
hi all,
Ok, raph is going to kill me. We met at GUADEC and
discussed some gdome stuff with a few other ppl.
The idea is that I am going to:
- remove autogen
- clean code, remove duplicated code
- move to libxml2
- implement Node and Attribute interfaces
- cleanup
- implement the rest of the Core 1 spec.
I will do a lot of this during my 2 week vacations
starting now. I will commit everything to GNOME's
CVS repository into a new cvs module: gdome2.
I would like to hear raph's ideas about the folowing.
libxml2 still uses the *_EVIL_*
#include <tree.h>
and not
#include <gnome-xml/tree.h>
Daniel told me that he would probably switch from libxml2.so.xx
to libxml.so.xx when libxml2 has stabilized.
I don't know about the last point but the I don't like the 1st
one.
I think I don't understand why DV_ wants to keep the 1st one.
He tried to explain me but I cannot think like him.
What he said was something like "source compatible breakage".
I don't understand how a one-line change in all applications
is bad.
any comments ?
regards,
Mathieu
-- Mathieu Lacage Snailmail: ch 224, 212 Rue de Tolbiac 75013 Paris email: mathieu@advogato.org url: http://www.stud.enst.fr/~lacage ---- message from gdome@rufus.w3.org Archive at http://rufus.w3.org/tools/gdome/messages/ Unsubscribing: echo "unsubscribe gdome" | mail majordomo@rufus.w3.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Wed Apr 05 2000 - 09:54:00 EDT