Re: [gdome] Future development of gdome

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [gdome] Future development of gdome
From: Mathieu Lacage (lacage@email.enst.fr)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2000 - 20:57:01 EST


Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org> writes:

> I would happily remove them if not needed. Also tell me if something
> else is specifically needed for DOM operation. I understand that
> having a pointer to an application (be it DOM or other) datatype
> may still be useful. Feedback on those issues is needed,

>From what I have seen in Gill, there is need for an application data pointer
in the EventListener's callback which needs a way to get data specific to the
EventListener/EventTarget it is being called upon.

see the gdome_xml_evntl_get_priv function from gdome which I just created.

Mathieu

----
message from gdome@rufus.w3.org
Archive at http://rufus.w3.org/tools/gdome/messages/
Unsubscribing: echo "unsubscribe gdome" | mail majordomo@rufus.w3.org


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b27 : Tue Jan 25 2000 - 14:54:01 EST