Re: [rpm2html 1.5 patch] signature processing

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Peter Hanecak (hanecak@megaloman.com)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 07:39:50 EST

On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> half, there is a check on the HTML page timestamp and the RPM timestamp
> done to avoid this except in --force

actual rpm2html 1.5 code in html.c:dumpRpmHtml() :

    /*
     * !!!!!!!!
     * if (checkDate(buf, rpm->extra->stamp)) return;
     */

so why it is commented out?

but anyway, if I enable this code and put rpmResolveSignatures() after
this check, it should help.

Peter 

-- 
===================================================================
  Peter Hanecak <hanecak@megaloman.com>
  GPG pub.key: http://www.megaloman.com/gpg/hanecak-megaloman.txt
===================================================================

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 10 2001 - 18:40:13 EDT